Pediatric Otolaryngology fellowship virtual interview sentiments.

BACKGROUND: Interviews for Pediatric Otolaryngology fellowship rapidly transitioned to virtual interviews mid-cycle in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe perspectives on virtual versus in-person interviews for both applicants and program directors. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Surveys were conducted of all Pediatric Otolaryngology fellowship applicants participating in the San Francisco Match and program directors in 2020 and 2021. RESULTS: Out of 32 U.S. trained fellowship applicants, 24 completed the survey in 2020 and 18 in 2021. While 70% of applicants felt they did not get the same experience with virtual interviews, 75% did not feel it changed how they ranked programs. Applicant perception of virtual interviews improved in 2021, with the majority (56%) preferring virtual interviews if provided an option. Twenty out of 36 fellowship directors completed the survey in 2020, and eighteen in 2021. While fellowship directors continued to prefer in-person in 2021, an increased number (10% in 2020, 30% in 2021) felt continuing with virtual interviews may increase the number of applicants in the future. CONCLUSION: Based on the survey, both applicants and fellowship directors had a less favorable perception of virtual interviews compared to in-person interviews initially; however, applicant perception favored virtual interviews in 2021, while Program Directors continued to prefer in-person.

A national pediatric otolaryngology fellowship virtual dissection course using 3D printed simulators.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to create and evaluate a novel virtual platform dissection course to complement pediatric otolaryngology fellowship training in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A four-station, four-simulator virtual course was delivered to pediatric otolaryngology fellows virtually using teleconferencing software. The four stations consisted of microtia ear carving, airway graft carving, cleft lip repair, and cleft palate repair. Fellows were asked to complete pre- and post-course surveys to evaluate their procedural confidence, expertise, and attitudes towards the course structure. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of pre-course survey data showed fellows agreed that simulators should play an important part in surgical training (4.59 (0.62)); would like more options for training with simulators (4.31 (0.88)); and would like the option of saving their simulators for later reference (4.41 (0.85)). Fellows found the surgical simulators used in the course to be valuable as potential training tools (3.96 (0.96)), as competency or evaluation tools (3.91 (0.98)), and as rehearsal tools (4.06 (0.93)). Analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in overall surgical confidence in performing all four procedures. CONCLUSION: This virtual surgical dissection course demonstrates 3D printed surgical simulators can be utilized to teach fellows advanced surgical techniques in a low-risk, virtual environment. Virtual platforms are a viable, highly-rated option for surgical training in the setting of restricted in-person meetings and as a mechanism to increase access for fellows by reducing costs and travel requirements during unrestricted periods.